System and Apparatus for Providing Beamforming Vector for Wireless Network Systems, Method, Program and Recording Media Using Thereof

ABSTRACT

The present invention relates to a system and an apparatus for providing beamforming vector for a very high density cellular networks, a method, a program and a recording medium using thereof. A transmitter that comprises a plurality of cell and an apparatus for providing beamforming vector, wherein the apparatus for providing beamforming vector controls a signal transmission of each of the plurality of cell; the apparatus for providing beamforming vector that defines a probability (ψ) of interference cancelation, expresses a network-wide sum rate as a function of ψ, calculates a value of ψ that maximizes the network-wide sum rate and calculates magnitude of canceled interference channel corresponding the value of ψ; and a receiver that receives a signal from the transmitter and comprises at least one mobile station and designs the beamforming vector that maximizes the network-wide sum rate by using ψ.

CROSS-REFERENCE TO RELATED APPLICATION

This application claims the benefit under 35 USC 119(a) of Korean Patent Application No. 10-2015-0038151 filed on Mar. 19, 2015, in the Korean Intellectual Property Office, the entire disclosure of which is incorporated herein by reference for all purposes.

BACKGROUND OF INVENTION

1. Technical Field

The present invention relates to a system and an apparatus for providing beamforming vector for a very high density cellular networks, a method, a program and a recording medium using thereof. More specifically, a system, an apparatus, a method, a program and a recording media for providing beamforming vector for wireless network systems that reduces complexity of the system by a one-shot (non-iterative) decision of beamforming vectors according to a predetermined decision metric called global selfishness is provided.

2. Background Art

Recently, as an unlimited data plan of telecommunication companies, traffic of mobile communication data rapidly increases by an unprecedented rate. To meet this rapidly increasing the traffic of mobile communication data, high-density cellular networks that have more and smaller cells are proposed, such as Femtocell. However, a gain of spatial reuse by using micro-miniature cell fatally involves very high maintenance costs. As the network infrastructure is increasingly crowded with the addition of small cells, inter-cell interference (ICI) is getting worse, and the amount of information that requires computation is increasing in order to manage ICI. Therefore, a method for managing the ICI effectively while lowering the complexity is required.

More specifically, a cooperative beamforming (BF) schemes that using a multi-antenna are used for the multiple access system in order to improve the performance of the system and increase a capacity. Typically, a cooperative beamforming schemes refers to arranging a plurality of antennas at regular intervals, transferring the signal to each antenna given by applying weighting vector.

In cellular networks, ICI has known to be one of the most dominating factors that determine the performance of cellular systems. The sum rate performance is significantly degraded by ICI especially when a small number of frequency reuse factor is adopted in the network. Thus, there have been seamless efforts to efficiently reduce the ICI by introducing cooperative beamforming among the cells. A well-known coordinated multi-point (CoMP) technique is one example of this effort, which has been rigorously developed for commercial 3^(rd) generation partnership project long term evolution (3GPP-LTE) systems. The main hurdle for the network-wide sum rate maximization is tits mathematical intractability. It is very difficult to determine the cooperative beamforming vectors that maximize the desired signal power of one cell while minimizing the generated interference to other cells since they are all coupled in terms of the sum rate. Unfortunately, no closed-form solution has been known for the problem. Instead, some alternative approaches have been proposed in the literature (non-patent document 3˜9) as below.

Referring to the non-patent document 3 and 4, a new matric is defined as the ratio of the desired signal power and generated interference to neighboring cells and noise power (SGINR), and the cooperative beamforming vectors in each cell are individually determined to maximize it. The SGINR based cooperative beamforming considers both the maximization of the desired signal power and the minimization of the generated interference to neighbors, increasing the network-wide sum rate. For a two-cell case, it has been proved that the SGINR-based cooperative beamforming is equivalent to the optimal beamforming that maximizes the network-wide sum rate.

Zero forcing (ZF) beamforming can be used to obtain an optimal weight vector for each antenna. Zero forcing beamforming is to remove the interference signal by multiplying the inverse matrix of the channel in advance when transmitting the signals, so that no interference occurs to the other receivers that are not the target of transmitting the signals. Thus, zero forcing beamforming is regarded as altruistic beamforming. On the contrary, maximal ratio transmission (MRT) is the beamforming that focuses its power on the target receiver without considering interference to the other receivers. Therefore, maximal ratio transmission beamforming is regarded as egoistic beamforming.

Therefore, high transmission efficiency can be expected when using the egoistic beamforming, such as the maximum ratio transmission beamforming in the communication environment at the favorable channel condition, and using the altruistic beamforming, such as zero-forcing beamforming in the communication environment at the inferior channel condition. However, the channel condition changes over time, it is required to combine egoistic beamforming and altruistic beamforming properly in order to obtain the optimal transmission efficiency. Non-patent documents 5 to 8 suggest the beamforming that is the proper linear combination of the ZF and MRT.

In non-patent document 5, it has been shown that a simple linear-type combination of egoistic beamforming and altruistic beamforming can achieve the Pareto optimality in MISO (Multiple-Input Single-Output). Pareto optimal for the transmitter that is available for channel state information (CSI) partially in MISO system has been disclosed in non-patent document 6. MIMO system from the game-theoretic point of view has been disclosed in non-patent document 7. These non-patent document are to achieve performance close to the optimal using the Bayesian games that allow each of the base station (BS) to operate semi-distributed. Non-patent document 8 proposed the beamforming scheme that uses the degree of the interference for the bargaining value. This takes into all of instantaneous value and statistical value of the CSI. Non-patent document 9 proposed the inter-cell cooperative beamforming based on the virtual-SINR.

RELATED ART DOCUMENT Patent Document

(Patent Document 1) US 20060189280 A1, Pattern diversity to support a MIMO communications system and associated methods, Inter Digital Technology Corporation

(Patent Document 2) KR 10-1488771 B1, Beamforming device and method with channel distribution information and interference temperature level control for MISO interference channel, Korea Advanced Institute of Science and Technology

Non-Patent Document

(Non-Patent Document 1) S. Cartreux, P. F. Driessen, and L. J. Greenstein, “Simulation results for an interference-limited multiple-input multiple-output cellular system,” IEEE Commun. Lett., vol. 4, no. 11, pp. 334-336, November 2000.

(Non-Patent Document 2) 3GPP, TR 36.819, v11.1.0 “Coordinated multi-point operation for LTE physical layer aspects (release 11),” December 2011.

(Non-Patent Document 3) M. Sadek, A. Tarighat, and A. H. Sayed, “A leakage-based precoding scheme for downlink multi-user MIMO channels,” IEEE Trans. Wireless Commun., Vol. 6, no. 5, pp. 11711-1721, May 2007.

(Non-Patent Document 4) B. O. Lee, H. W. Je, O.-S. Shin, and K. B. Lee, “A novel uplink MIMO transmission scheme in a multicell environment.” IEEE Trans. Wireless Commun., vol. 8, no. 10, pp. 4981-4987, October 2009.

(Non-Patent Document 5) E. A. Jorswieck, E. G. Larsson, and D. Danev, “Complete characterization of the Pareto boundary for the MISO interference channel,” IEEE Trans. Signal Processing, vol. 56, no. 10, pp. 5292-5296, October 2008.

(Non-Patent Document 6) J. Lindblom, E. Karipidis, and E. G. Larsson, “Selfishness and altruism on the MISO interference channel: the case of partial transmit CSI,” IEEE Commun. letters, vol. 13, no. 9, pp. 667-669, September 2009.

(Non-Patent Document 7) Z. K. M. Ho, and D. Gesbert, “Balancing egoism and altruism on interference channel: The MIMO case,” in IEEE International conference on communications (ICC) 2010, Cape Town, South Africa, May 2010.

(Non-Patent Document 8) J. Lindblom, and E. Karipidis, “Cooperative beamforming for the MISO interference channel,” IEEE European Wireless Conference (EW) 2010, Lucca, Italy, April 2010.

(Non-Patent Document 9) S. H. Park, H. Park, H. Kong, and I. Lee, “New beamforming techniques based on virtual SINR maximization for coordinated multi-cell transmission,” IEEE Trans. Wireless Commun., vol. 11, no. 3, pp. 1034-1044, March 2012.

(Non-Patent Document 10) N. Jindal, J. G. Andrews, and S. Weber, “Rethinking MIMO for wireless networks: Linear throughput increase with multiple receive antennas,” IEEE International Conference on Communications (ICC) 2009, Dresden, Germany, June 2009.

BRIEF SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION Problems to be Solved by the Invention

However, the aforementioned inter-cell cooperative beamforming vector providing method (Non-patent Document 5 to 9) has a problem in that an iterative process is required to calculate the beamforming vector inter-cell cooperation. According to the conventional beamforming scheme, each BS need to create a new beamforming vector for changes in all the channels conditions. Therefore, when the channel conditions changes continuously, there was bound to be a tremendous complexity, according to the conventional method. After all, in practice, the most important factor is to reduce this complexity. It is necessary to provide beamforming vector method to reduce this complexity.

Accordingly, the present invention is proposed in order to solve these problems. The purpose of the present invention is to provide inter-cell cooperative beam-forming scheme, which is calculated as one-shot (iteration is not required) for optimized beamforming vector.

Means for Solving the Problem

In order to accomplish the purpose of the present invention, an exemplary embodiment of the present invention provides a system that provides a beamforming vector, the system comprising: a transmitter that comprises a plurality of cell and an apparatus for providing beamforming vector, wherein the apparatus for providing beamforming vector controls a signal transmission of each of the plurality of cell; the apparatus for providing beamforming vector that defines a probability (ψ) of interference cancelation, expresses a network-wide sum rate as a function of ψ, calculates a value of ψ that maximizes the network-wide sum rate and calculates magnitude of canceled interference channel corresponding the value of ψ; and a receiver that receives a signal from the transmitter and comprises at least one mobile station and designs the beamforming vector that maximizes the network-wide sum rate by using ψ.

According to an aspect of the present invention, the network-wide sum rate is derived by following equation:

$\begin{matrix} {{{E\left\lbrack {R_{sum}(\psi)} \right\rbrack} = {{{\left( {1 - \psi} \right)^{2}{E\left\lbrack {{\log_{2}\left( {1 + \Gamma_{1}^{({0,0})}} \right)}\left( {1 + \Gamma_{2}^{({0,0})}} \right)} \right\rbrack}} + {{\psi \left( {1 - \psi} \right)}{E\left\lbrack {{\log_{2}\left( {1 + \Gamma_{1}^{({0,1})}} \right)}\left( {1 + \Gamma_{2}^{({1,0})}} \right)} \right\rbrack}} + {{\psi \left( {1 - \psi} \right)}{E\left\lbrack {{\log_{2}\left( {1 + \Gamma_{1}^{({1,0})}} \right)}\left( {1 + \Gamma_{2}^{({0,1})}} \right)} \right\rbrack}} + {\psi^{2}{E\left\lbrack {{\log_{2}\left( {1 + \Gamma_{1}^{({1,1})}} \right)}\left( {1 + \Gamma_{2}^{({1,1})}} \right)} \right\rbrack}}} \leq {{\left( {1 - \psi} \right)^{2}{\log_{2}\left( {{E\left\lbrack {1 + \Gamma_{1}^{({0,0})}} \right\rbrack}{E\left\lbrack {1 + \Gamma_{2}^{({0,0})}} \right)}} \right\rbrack}} + {{\psi \left( {1 - \psi} \right)}{\log_{2}\left( {{E\left\lbrack {1 + \Gamma_{1}^{({0,1})}} \right\rbrack}{E\left\lbrack {1 + \Gamma_{2}^{({1,0})}} \right)}} \right\rbrack}} + {{\psi \left( {1 - \psi} \right)}{\log_{2}\left( {{E\left\lbrack {1 + \Gamma_{1}^{({1,0})}} \right\rbrack}{E\left\lbrack {1 + \Gamma_{2}^{({0,1})}} \right)}} \right\rbrack}} + {\psi^{2}{\log_{2}\left( {{E\left\lbrack {1 + \Gamma_{1}^{({1,1})}} \right\rbrack}{E\left\lbrack {1 + \Gamma_{2}^{({1,1})}} \right)}} \right\rbrack}}} \equiv {R_{sum}^{U}(\psi)}}},} & \lbrack{Equation}\rbrack \end{matrix}$

where E(•) is a function for an expected value, R_(sum)(ψ) is the network-wide sum rate, R_(sum) ^(U)(ψ) is an upper bound of an expected value of the network-wide sum rate and Γ_(i) ^((m,l)) is SINR of the mobile station in an i-th cell where the i-th cell nullifies m generated interference links to neighboring cells and i-th cell received interference links of the mobile station in the i-th cell are nullified by the neighboring cells.

According to an aspect of the present invention, the value of ψ that maximizes the network-wide sum rate is derived by following equation:

$\begin{matrix} {{{(1)\mspace{14mu} A} < 0}{\psi^{*} = \begin{pmatrix} 0 & {if} & {\psi^{D} < 0} \\ \psi^{D} & {if} & {0 \leq \psi^{D} \leq 1} \\ 1 & {if} & {1 < \psi} \end{pmatrix}}{{(2)\mspace{14mu} A} > 0}{\psi^{*} = \begin{pmatrix} 0 & {if} & {{\psi^{D}} \leq {{\psi^{D} - 1}}} \\ 1 & {if} & {{\psi^{D}} > {{\psi^{D} - 1}}} \end{pmatrix}}{{where},{\psi^{D} = {{{- B}/2}\; A}},{{s.t.\mspace{14mu} \left\lbrack \frac{\partial{R_{sum}^{U}(\psi)}}{\partial\psi} \right\rbrack_{\psi = \psi^{D}}} = 0},{{R_{sum}^{U}(\psi)} \approx {{A\; \psi^{2}} + {B\; \psi} + C}},}} & \lbrack{Equation}\rbrack \end{matrix}$

where R_(sum)(ψ) is the network-wide sum rate, R_(sum) ^(U)(ψ) is an upper bound of an expected value of the network-wide sum rate, ψ* is at least one optimal value of probability ψ, ψ^(D) is a point of at least one pole, A, B and C are coefficients determined by a power of the apparatus for providing the beamforming vector and a location of at least one receiver.

According to an aspect of the present invention, An apparatus for providing a beamforming vector that is comprised in a transmitter, wherein the transmitter that comprises a plurality of cell and transmits a signal to a receiver that comprises at least one mobile station, the apparatus comprising: a control module that defines a probability (ψ) of interference cancelation, expresses a network-wide sum rate as a function of ψ, calculates a value of ψ that maximizes the network-wide sum rate and calculates magnitude of canceled interference channel corresponding the value of ψ.

According to an aspect of the present invention, a method for providing beamforming vector by an apparatus for providing beamforming vector that is comprised in a transmitter, wherein the transmitter that comprises a plurality of cell and transmits a signal to a receiver that comprises at least one mobile station, the method comprising defining a probability (ψ) of interference cancelation; expressing a network-wide sum rate as a function of ψ; calculating a value of ψ that maximizes the network-wide sum rate; and calculating magnitude of canceled interference channel corresponding the value of ψ.

According to an aspect of the present invention, a non-transitory recording medium storing a readable program for causing a computer to execute a method for providing beamforming vector by an apparatus for providing beamforming vector that is comprised in a transmitter, wherein the transmitter that comprises a plurality of cell and transmits a signal to a receiver that comprises at least one mobile station, the method comprising: defining a probability (ψ) of interference cancelation; expressing a network-wide sum rate as a function of ψ; calculating a value of ψ that maximizes the network-wide sum rate; and calculating magnitude of canceled interference channel corresponding the value of ψ.

Effect of the Invention

With the exemplary embodiment of the present invention, the inter-cell cooperative beam-forming scheme is effective to maximize the average of the network-wide sum rate. Conventional methods proposed in the prior literature was focused on the instantaneous maximization for the sum rate and iterative calculation. However, according to an embodiment of the invention is to focus on maximizing the average of the sum rate of some or the overall network system.

In addition, according to an embodiment of the present invention, it is unnecessary to iteratively perform the calculation to find the optimal beamforming vector so that only a one-shot is needed to calculate the approximately optimal average sum rate.

Moreover, according to an embodiment of the present invention, as well as 2-cell system, it is possible to easily apply the k-cell system.

Further, according to an embodiment of the present invention, in terms of the reduction of the sustainable calculated overload, the system for providing beamforming vector is suitable for a cellular network, in particular ultra-high density network.

BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS

FIG. 1 is a view illustrating an example of a system for providing beamforming vector according to embodiment of the present invention.

FIG. 2 is a view illustrating a block diagram of element of the apparatus for providing beamforming vector according to embodiment of the present invention.

FIG. 3 a view illustrating a flow chart of the method for providing beamforming vector according to embodiment of the present invention.

FIG. 4 illustrates how the optimal global selfishness λ* varies with the distance of a MS from a BS according to an exemplary embodiment of the present invention.

FIG. 5 illustrates sum rate performance compared to conventional beamforming in 2-cell cellular system according to an exemplary embodiment of the present invention.

FIG. 6 illustrates sum rate performance compared to conventional beamforming in 3-cell cellular system according to an exemplary embodiment of the present invention.

DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE INVENTION

In the following detailed description, only certain exemplary embodiments of the present invention have been shown and described, simply by way of illustration. As those skilled in the art would realize, the described embodiments may be modified in various different ways, all without departing from the spirit or scope of the present invention. Accordingly, the drawings and description are to be regarded as illustrative in nature and not restrictive. Like reference numerals designate like elements throughout the specification.

In the specification, unless explicitly described to the contrary, the word “comprise” and variations such as “comprises” or “comprising” will be understood to imply the inclusion of stated elements but not the exclusion of any other elements. In addition, the terms “-er”, “-or”, and “module” described in the specification mean units for processing at least one function and operation, and can be implemented by hardware components or software components and combinations thereof.

Generally, a communication system includes a transmitter and a receiver. Herein, the transmitter and the receiver may be referred to as a transceiver that performs both a transmission function and a receiving function. In the present specification, one side to perform data transmission through beamforming will be referred to as the transmitter, and the other side to transmit feedback information to the transmitter will be referred to as the receiver. In the downlink channel, the transmitter may be a transmitter and the receiver may be a receiver.

In the specification, unselfish beamforming that is performed to not generate interference in the receiver rather than concentrating power on an object receiving information will be referred to as first beamforming, and selfish beamforming that concentrates power only in a specific receiver, not considering interference affecting the receiver, will be referred to as second beamforming.

For convenience of explanation, in an exemplary embodiment, zero forming (hereinafter referred to as “ZF”) beamforming will be described by way of example of the first beamforming, and maximal ratio transmission (hereinafter referred to as “MRT”) beamforming will be described by way of example of the second beamforming.

System for Providing Beamforming Vector

FIG. 1 is a view illustrating an example of a system for providing beamforming vector according to embodiment of the present invention. Specifically, FIG. 1 is a view illustrating an example of MISO interference channel systems. Though embodiment of the present invention is described considering MISO interference channel, this is to provide convenience of explanation and understanding for the present invention. Moreover, it is not to admit that the present invention does not include MIMO interference channel systems. Considering a usual technician in communication engineering, the present invention for MISO interference channel systems is applicable to MIMO interference channel systems. Referring FIG. 1, the system for providing beamforming vector 10 includes k base stations (BSs) and n mobile stations (MSs) associated with each BS. Each BS and each MS in the system for providing beamforming vector 10 equip N_(t) transmit antennas and single receive antenna, respectively.

Each BS in the system for providing beamforming vector 10 transmits signal to one MS that is associated with BS. The above MS is influenced by interference signals of neighboring BSs while BS transmits signal to MS. According to embodiment of the present invention, it is defined that the system for providing beamforming vector considers MISO interference channel model in the following explanation

In the following explanations, it is described that the system for providing beamforming vector 10 is a cellular communication system model when k=2 and n=1. In other words, the system for providing beamforming vector 10 includes two BSs as transmitter 110 and one MS as receiver 120 associated with each BS. The above BS and MS equip N_(t) transmit antennas and single receive antenna, respectively. In the followings, to understand clearly, the system for providing beamforming assumes downlink transmission 2-cell models where one user is served per cell

Apparatus for Providing Beamforming Vector

FIG. 2 is a view illustrating a block diagram of element of the apparatus for providing beamforming vector according to embodiment of the present invention. Referring FIG. 2, the apparatus for providing beamforming vector designs transmit beamforming vector that maximizes the sum rate by using probability of interference cancelation. The apparatus for providing beamforming vector 1 is equipped in transmitter 110. The apparatus for providing beamforming vector 1 can be systems of personal computer that is equipped in transmitter 110 such as computer desktop computer, laptop computer and handheld computer.

In addition, the apparatus for providing beamforming vector 1 can be a high performance computer that is equipped in transmitter 110 such as a supercomputer and a large scale computer. The apparatus for providing beamforming vector 1 can be include at least one input module 210, at least one control module 220, at least one output module 230 and at least one storage 240.

The input module 210 can receive channel state information for designing beamforming vector. The above channel state information can be local channel information.

The output module 230 can output designed beamforming vector.

Therefore, the transmitter 110 can transmit signals to receiver using optimized beamforming vector that is designed at apparatus for providing beamforming vector 1.

At least one of information of the above input module 210, beamforming design algorithm and variables can be stored at the storage 240. The storage 240 can store information that is inputted at the input module 210. Moreover, when the above information changes, the storage 240 can delete existing information and update new information.

The control module 220 does the following works. {circle around (1)} defining the probability (ψ) of interference cancelation, {circle around (2)} expressing network-wide sum rate as a function of ψ, {circle around (3)} calculating the value of ψ that maximizes the network-wide sum rate, {circle around (4)} calculating magnitude of canceled interference channel corresponding the value of ψ, {circle around (5)} each BS can design beamforming vector that maximizes sum rate by using ψ.

In addition, BS can be a transmitter or a transmitting end, MS can be a receiver or a receiving end.

Method for Providing Beamforming Vector

FIG. 3 a view illustrating a flow chart of the method for providing beamforming vector according to embodiment of the present invention. Referring FIG. 3, the method for providing beamforming vector according to embodiment of the present invention includes the following stages. {circle around (1)} The control module 220 of the apparatus for providing beamforming vector 1 defines the probability (ψ) of interference cancelation (S10). {circle around (2)} The control module 220 expresses network-wide sum rate as function of ψ (S20). {circle around (3)} The control module 220 calculates the value of ψ that maximizes the network-wide sum rate (S30). {circle around (4)} The control module 220 calculates magnitude of canceled interference channel corresponding the value of ψ (S40). {circle around (5)} Each BS design beamforming vector that maximizes sum rate by using ψ (S50).

In conclusion, the proposed system, apparatus and method for providing beamforming vector for wireless network systems aim to optimize network sum rate and design cooperative beamforming vector by one-shot (non-iterative) process. The detailed derivation is described in the following.

According to an embodiment of the present invention of the apparatus for providing beamforming vector, each BS can determine the beamforming vector by using predetermined metric what we term a global selfishness. The global selfishness can be interpreted as the amount that each cell can behave selfishly or altruistically to maximize the network-wide sum rate.

In the followings, the boldface small letters denote vectors. “∥•∥” denotes a norm, “Pr(•)” denotes a probability, and “E(•)” denotes an expectation.

In a 2-cell cellular network model of downlink transmission according to the embodiment of the present invention, it can assume that each BS and each MS equip N_(t) transmit antennas and single receive antenna, respectively. The received signal vector y_(i) at the MS in the i-th cell can be expressed as Equation 1. This is to provide convenience of explanation and understanding for the present invention. Moreover, it is not to admit that the present invention does not include MIMO interference channel systems and is applicable to MIMO interference channel systems.

$\begin{matrix} {{{y_{i} = {{\sqrt{\rho_{i}}h_{ii}w_{i}x_{i}} + {\sqrt{\rho_{ji}}h_{ji}w_{j}x_{j}} + n_{i}}},i,{j \in \left\{ {1,2} \right\}},{i \neq j}}{{y_{i} = {{\sqrt{\rho_{i}}h_{ii}w_{i}x_{i}} + {\sum\limits_{j = 1}^{k}{\sqrt{\rho_{ji}}h_{ji}w_{j}x_{j}}} + n_{i}}},i,{j \in \left\{ {1,2,\ldots \mspace{14mu},k} \right\}},{i \neq j}}} & \left\lbrack {{Equation}\mspace{14mu} 1} \right\rbrack \end{matrix}$

In the above Equation 1, h_(ji) denotes 1×N_(t) channel vector between BS in the j-th cell and the MS in the i-th cell, w_(i) denotes N_(t)×1 corresponding beamforming vector at the BS in the i-th cell. x_(i) is the signal transmitted from the i-th BS to the i-th MS. The first equation in Equation 1 represents 2-cell cellular network and the second equation in Equation 1 represents k-cell cellular network. For providing convenience of explanation and understanding, it uses 2-cell cellular network in the followings.

It assumes that the elements of h_(ji) follow independent and identically distributed complex Gaussian distribution with zero mean and unit variance. In addition, n_(i) denotes the additive white Gaussian noise (AWGN) at the i-th MS with unit variance, ρ_(i) denotes the average signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) of the MS in the i-th cell, and ρ_(ji) is the average interference-to-noise ratio (INR) for the interference that the BS in the j-th cell causes to the MS in the i-th cell.

The received SINR (Signal-to-interference-plus-noise ratio) γ_(i) of the MS in the i-th cell can be computed from Equation 1 as Equation 2.

$\begin{matrix} {{\gamma_{i} = \frac{\rho_{i}{{h_{ii}w_{i}}}^{2}}{1 + {\rho_{ji}{{h_{ji}w_{j}}}^{2}}}},i,{j \in \left\{ {1,2} \right\}},{{i \neq {j.\gamma_{i}}} = \frac{\rho_{i}{{h_{ii}w_{i}}}^{2}}{1 + {\sum\limits_{j = 1}^{k}{\rho_{ji}{{h_{ji}w_{j}}}^{2}}}}},i,{j \in \left\{ {1,2,\ldots \mspace{14mu},k} \right\}},{i \neq {j.}}} & \left\lbrack {{Equation}\mspace{14mu} 2} \right\rbrack \end{matrix}$

The first equation in Equation 2 represents 2-cell cellular network and the second equation in Equation 2 represents k-cell cellular network. For providing convenience of calculation, considering 2-cell cellular network, the network-wide sum rate of all cells R_(i) from Equation 2 is given as Equation 3.

R _(i)=log₂(1+γ_(i))

And the network-wide sum rate of all k-cells is expressed as Equation 4.

$\begin{matrix} {R_{sum} = {\sum\limits_{j = 1}^{k}\; R_{j}}} & \left\lbrack {{Equation}\mspace{14mu} 4} \right\rbrack \end{matrix}$

k-cell cellular network model that includes 2-cell cellular network determines optimal w_(i) to maximize R_(sum). However, it is impossible to solve the sum rate maximization problem by mathematical process. It was proposed alternate solutions such as finding Pareto optimal (Non-Patent Document 5) and using Game-theory (Non-Patent Document 7). However, the conventional solutions in Non-Patent Document 5 and Non-Patent Document 7 consider only 2-cell cellular networks and it causes serious problems to solve sum rate maximization problems for k-cell cellular networks.

Therefore, to solve these problems, the embodiment of the present invention defines probability (ψ) of interference cancelation of BS that can be network policy. In detail, {circle around (1)} defining the probability (ψ) of interference cancelation {circle around (2)} expressing network-wide sum rate as function of ψ {circle around (3)} calculating the value of ψ that maximizes the network-wide sum rate {circle around (4)} calculating magnitude of canceled interference channel corresponding the value of ψ {circle around (5)} each BS can design beamforming vector that maximizes sum rate by using ψ.

Specifically, considering problems Equation 1, 2, 3 and 4 in the embodiment of the present invention, it is described the system for providing beamforming vector according to embodiment of the present invention as the followings.

{circle around (1)} Stage that Defines the Probability (ψ) of Interference Cancelation (S10)

The system for providing beamforming vector according to embodiment of the present invention includes simple beamforming scheme by using predetermined global selfishness that works in non-iterative manner and achieves near optimal sum rate performance.

The global selfishness (λ) can be interpreted as the amount that each cell can behave selfishly or altruistically to maximize the network-wide sum rate. The optimal value of the global selfishness (λ) is precomputed and shared as a network policy. Specifically, the i-th BS determines whether its interference links to neighboring cells are dominant or not by checking the channel gains of the interference links with λ. It can be expressed as Equation 5.

Φ_(i) ={j|∥h _(ij)∥²≧λ}  [Equation 5]

φ_(i) denotes the set of dominant interference links of the i-th BS. The beamforming vector is then computed to nullify the dominant interference links as Equation 6.

|h _(ij) w _(i)|²=0, ∀j ∈ Φ _(i)   [Equation 6]

When λ is small, the entire network enters an altruistic mood where each cell tends to determine its cooperative beamforming vector that nullifies interference power to its neighboring cells. In the limit of λ→0 the proposed beamforming nullifies all the interference links, and becomes equivalent to the well-known ZF beamforming. The opposite is true for large λ, and the proposed beamforming becomes equivalent to the MRT beamforming in the limit of λ→∞.

There exist four possible cases depending on whether each BS acts in an egoistic or an altruistic way. Those cases and corresponding probabilities are tabulated in following Table 1.

TABLE 1 Case # BS₁ BS₂ Probability Case 1 Egoistic Egoistic (1-ψ)² Case 2 Egoistic Altruistic (1-ψ)ψ Case 3 Altruistic Egoistic ψ(1-ψ) Case 4 Altruistic Altruistic ψ²

As tabulated in Table 1, cases and corresponding probability are defined as the above. Specifically, ψ is defined as Equation 7.

ψ=Pr(∥h _(ji)∥²>λ)   [Equation 7]

Case 1 implies that all BSs operate selfishly where no BS nullifies interference links. In the case 2 and case 3, one BS nullifies its generated interference link, and the other BS operates selfishly. Case 4 implies that all BSs nullify the generated interference link and all MSs whose received interference link are nullified.

{circle around (2)} Stage that Expresses Network-Wide Sum Rate as Function of ψ (S20)

SINR of the MS in the i-th cell can be defined as random variable Γ_(i) ^((m,l)) where the i-th BS nullifies m generated interference links to neighboring cells and l received interference links of the MS in the i-th cell are nullified by the neighboring BSs. Γ_(i) ^((m,l)) can be expressed as the following Equation 8.

$\begin{matrix} {{\Gamma_{i}^{({m,l})} = \frac{\rho_{i}\chi_{2{({N_{i} - m})}}^{2}}{1 + {{\rho_{ji}\left( {1 - l} \right)}{\beta \left( {1,{N_{t} - 1}} \right)}}}},m,{l \in \left\{ {0,1} \right\}}} & \left\lbrack {{Equation}\mspace{14mu} 8} \right\rbrack \end{matrix}$

In the above Equation 8, χ_(n) ² denotes the Chi-square distribution random variable with n degrees of freedom. The numerator of Equation 8 can be followed from lemma 2 of Non-Patent Document 10. The denominator of Equation 8 can be derived as Beta-distribution random variables since h_(ji) and w_(j) are independent and isotopically distributed in the N_(t)-dimensional complex domain, and thus the product of them can be expressed by a well-known Beta-distribution function. Since l received interference links of the MS are nullified by the neighboring BSs, the denominator of Equation 8 can be expressed as above. Considering the four possible cases, R_(sum)(ψ) can be derived as the following Equation 9 by using Equation 4 and Equation 8.

$\begin{matrix} {{E\left\lbrack {R_{sum}(\psi)} \right\rbrack} = {\left( {1 - \psi} \right)^{2}{\log_{2}\left( {{\left( {1 + \Gamma_{1}^{({0,0})}} \right)\left( {1 + \Gamma_{2}^{({0,0})}} \right)} + {{\psi \left( {1 - \psi} \right)}{\log_{2}\left( {{\left( {1 + \Gamma_{1}^{({0,1})}} \right)\left( {1 + \Gamma_{2}^{({1,0})}} \right)} + {{\psi \left( {1 - \psi} \right)}{\log_{2}\left( {{\left( {1 + \Gamma_{1}^{({1,0})}} \right)\left( {1 + \Gamma_{2}^{({0,1})}} \right)} + {\psi^{2}{\log_{2}\left( {\left( {1 + \Gamma_{1}^{({1,1})}} \right)\left( {1 + \Gamma_{2}^{({1,1})}} \right)} \right.}}} \right.}}} \right.}}} \right.}}} & \left\lbrack {{Equation}\mspace{14mu} 9} \right\rbrack \end{matrix}$

For sum rate analysis, the expected sum rate and its upper bound are derived in following Equation 10. The upper bound of the expected sum rate is expressed as R_(sum) ^(U)(ψ).

$\begin{matrix} {{{E\left\lbrack {R_{sum}(\psi)} \right\rbrack} = {{{\left( {1 - \psi} \right)^{2}{E\left\lbrack {{\log_{2}\left( {1 + \Gamma_{1}^{({0,0})}} \right)}\left( {1 + \Gamma_{2}^{({0,0})}} \right)} \right\rbrack}} + {{\psi \left( {1 - \psi} \right)}{E\left\lbrack {{\log_{2}\left( {1 + \Gamma_{1}^{({0,1})}} \right)}\left( {1 + \Gamma_{2}^{({1,0})}} \right)} \right\rbrack}} + {{\psi \left( {1 - \psi} \right)}{E\left\lbrack {{\log_{2}\left( {1 + \Gamma_{1}^{({1,0})}} \right)}\left( {1 + \Gamma_{2}^{({0,1})}} \right)} \right\rbrack}} + {\psi^{2}{E\left\lbrack {{\log_{2}\left( {1 + \Gamma_{1}^{({1,1})}} \right)}\left( {1 + \Gamma_{2}^{({1,1})}} \right)} \right\rbrack}}} \leq {{\left( {1 - \psi} \right)^{2}{\log_{2}\left( {{E\left\lbrack {1 + \Gamma_{1}^{({0,0})}} \right\rbrack}{E\left\lbrack {1 + \Gamma_{2}^{({0,0})}} \right)}} \right\rbrack}} + {{\psi \left( {1 - \psi} \right)}{\log_{2}\left( {{E\left\lbrack {1 + \Gamma_{1}^{({0,1})}} \right\rbrack}{E\left\lbrack {1 + \Gamma_{2}^{({1,0})}} \right)}} \right\rbrack}} + {{\psi \left( {1 - \psi} \right)}{\log_{2}\left( {{E\left\lbrack {1 + \Gamma_{1}^{({1,0})}} \right\rbrack}{E\left\lbrack {1 + \Gamma_{2}^{({0,1})}} \right)}} \right\rbrack}} + {\psi^{2}{\log_{2}\left( {{E\left\lbrack {1 + \Gamma_{1}^{({1,1})}} \right\rbrack}{E\left\lbrack {1 + \Gamma_{2}^{({1,1})}} \right)}} \right\rbrack}}} \equiv {R_{sum}^{U}(\psi)}}},} & \left\lbrack {{equation}\mspace{14mu} 10} \right\rbrack \end{matrix}$

The inequality in the above Equation 10 follows from Jensen's inequality. R_(sum) ^(U)(ψ) can be expressed as the following Equation 11 by using Equation 10.

R_(sum) ^(U)(ψ)≈Aψ²+Bψ+C   [Equation 11]

Considering the above Equation 11, ψ* that maximizes R_(sum) ^(U)(ψ) can be determined.

{circle around (3)} Stage that Calculates the Value of ψ that Maximizes the Network-Wide Sum Rate (S30)

Optimal probability ψ* maximizes R_(sum) ^(U)(ψ) and it can be expressed as ψ*=arg max R_(sum) ^(U)(ψ). Note that R_(sum) ^(U)(ψ) is a quadratic function of ψ. First consider that R_(sum) ^(U)(ψ) is a concave function (A<0). The point of pole ψ^(D) becomes the optimal point of ψ if ψ^(D) is located in [0,1]. If ψ^(D) is less than 0 or greater than 1, the optimal value of ψ* is 0 or 1, respectively. Then, consider that R_(sum) ^(U)(ψ) is a convex function (A>0). Either 0 or 1 that is closer to ψ^(D) becomes ψ*. In short, ψ* is determined as the following Equation 12.

$\begin{matrix} {{{(1)\mspace{14mu} A} < 0}{\psi^{*} = \begin{pmatrix} 0 & {if} & {\psi^{D} < 0} \\ \psi^{D} & {if} & {0 \leq \psi^{D} \leq 1} \\ 1 & {if} & {1 < \psi} \end{pmatrix}}{{(2)\mspace{14mu} A} > 0}{\psi^{*} = \begin{pmatrix} 0 & {if} & {{\psi^{D}} \leq {{\psi^{D} - 1}}} \\ 1 & {if} & {{\psi^{D}} > {{\psi^{D} - 1}}} \end{pmatrix}}{{where},{\psi^{D} = {{{- B}/2}\; A}},{{s.t.\mspace{14mu} \left\lbrack \frac{\partial{R_{sum}^{U}(\psi)}}{\partial\psi} \right\rbrack_{\psi = \psi^{D}}} = 0},{{R_{sum}^{U}(\psi)} \approx {{A\; \psi^{2}} + {B\; \psi} + C}},}} & \left\lbrack {{Equation}\mspace{14mu} 12} \right\rbrack \end{matrix}$

{circle around (4)} Stage Calculates Magnitude of Canceled Interference Channel Corresponding the Value of ψ (S40)

Furthermore, the optimal value of λ (λ*) can be determined since ∥h_(ji)∥² has a Gamma (N_(t),1) distribution and there is one-to-one correspondence between ψ and λ. Thus, λ* can be uniquely determined with ψ*.

{circle around (5)} Stage that Makes Each BS Design Beamforming Vector that Maximizes Sum Rate by using ψ (S50)

As optimal value λ* is determined, each BS can simply optimize network-wide sum rate through each BS nullifies the interference channels whose magnitude are larger than λ*. It will be verified in the numerical results.

According to embodiment of the present invention, the principal advantage of the proposed system for providing beamforming vector is that it requires much less computational complexity; it only requires a simple comparison of a channel with the given λ*. Since the computational complexity of scheme mainly comes from computations of the precoding vectors, we compare the computational complexity in terms of the required number of computations for precoding vectors. The proposed system for providing beamforming vector requires only a single computation of precoding vector, however, the previous iterative systems for providing beamforming vector require dozens of computations for precoding vectors, for example, the iterative systems for providing beamforming vector in Non-Patent Document 5 requires about 30 repeats of precoding vector computations.

Numerical Results of the Embodiment of the Present Invention

According to the system for providing beamforming vector of the embodiment of the present invention, the followings describes the numerical data of the embodiment of the present invention. It helps to understand clearly and verify the performance of the system for providing beamforming for a usual technician, it does not limit the scope of the embodiment of the present invention.

The numerical data of the embodiment of the present invention assumes that 2-cell cellular networks with Nt=2 and Nr=1. The pathloss exponent is set to 3.7 in the simulations.

FIG. 4 illustrates how the optimal global selfishness λ* varies with the distance of a MS from a BS according to an exemplary embodiment of the present invention. The SNR is set to 20 dB in the simulations. MS1 is uniformly located in 0.5R and R area and MS2 is located from 0.5R to R, where R denotes the cell radius. The dashed line denotes the optimal global selfishness computed from the average sum rate approximation in while the solid line denotes one searched from average sum rate observations with real channel realizations. Despite a slight overestimation of λ*, our analysis provides a computationally efficient way to determine λ*. When a MS is located near a BS, the optimal value of the global selfishness becomes high, which implies that each cell may behave selfishly, maximizing its own desired signal power. As a MS moves toward the cell edge, the optimal value of the global selfishness gradually decreases. Each cell should behave altruistically, suppressing the generated interference power to neighboring cells.

FIG. 5 illustrates sum rate performance compared to conventional beamforming in 2-cell cellular system according to an exemplary embodiment of the present invention. In FIG. 5, the numerical data of the embodiment of the present invention is compared to two non-iterative schemes, egoistic beamforming (MRT) and altruistic beamforming (ZF), SGINR based Eigen beamforming and one iterative scheme Non-Patent Document 5. The MS s are located in between 0.5R and R. As shown in FIG. 5, the numerical data of the embodiment of the present invention outperforms both altruistic and egoistic beamforming in all SNR values. This is because the proposed beamforming system attempts to balance the egoism and altruism with the help of the decision metric, i.e., global selfishness. As compared to SGINR based Eigen beamforming, the proposed beamforming system performs as V-SINR based Eigen beamforming approximately. The performance of the proposed beamforming system achieves 93% of the iterative Pareto optimal beamforming performance. Specifically, the iterative beamforming requires about 40 iterations for providing beamforming vector. Moreover, the proposed beamforming system offers substantial reduction in computational burden and it is applicable high density small cellular network systems.

FIG. 6 illustrates sum rate performance compared to conventional beamforming in 3-cell cellular system according to an exemplary embodiment of the present invention. As illustrated in FIG. 6, the average sum rate performance of the embodiment of the present invention can be compared to those of the conventional beamforming systems in 3-cell cellular network systems. In FIG. 6, the average sum rate performance of the embodiment of the present invention is compared to two non-iterative schemes, egoistic beamforming (MRT) and altruistic beamforming (ZF) and SGINR based Eigen beamforming. The Pareto iterative beamforming systems is applicable for only 2-cell cellular network, therefore, it is excluded in FIG. 6. As shown in FIG. 6, the average sum rate performance of SGINR based beamforming outperforms other beamformings in low interference regions. However, the average sum rate performance of the embodiment of the present invention outperforms other beamformings in high interference region where SNR is larger than 12 dB.

The SGINR based Eigen beamforming requires some assumptions, e.g., high SINR, to be valid for general M>2 network scenarios while the proposed beamforming system can be analytically derived for any M>2 network scenarios by focusing on the average sum rate metric. In this sense, the performance improvement of the proposed beamforming system over the SGINR based Eigen beamforming becomes larger in cell edges as shown in FIG. 6. This makes the embodiment of the present invention more appropriate for practical cellular applications.

Computer Program and Recording Media for Providing Beamforming Vector

Computer program for providing beamforming vector according to embodiment of the present invention can be implemented in computer system by using the above described stages. Recording media can be read in computer for providing beamforming vector according to embodiment of the present invention can be USB and CD, etc. that record the computer program for providing beamforming vector according to embodiment of the present invention.

DESCRIPTION OF REFERENCE NUMERALS

1: the apparatus for providing beamforming vector

10: the system for providing beamforming vector

110: a transmitter

120: a receiver

210: an input module

220: a control module

230: an output module

240: a storage 

What we claim is:
 1. A system for providing a beamforming vector, the system comprising: a transmitter that comprises a plurality of cell and an apparatus for providing beamforming vector, wherein the apparatus for providing beamforming vector controls a signal transmission of each of the plurality of cell; the apparatus for providing beamforming vector that defines a probability (ψ) of interference cancelation, expresses a network-wide sum rate as a function of ψ, calculates a value of ψ that maximizes the network-wide sum rate and calculates magnitude of canceled interference channel corresponding the value of ψ; and a receiver that receives a signal from the transmitter and comprises at least one mobile station and designs the beamforming vector that maximizes the network-wide sum rate by using ψ.
 2. The system of claim 1, wherein the network-wide sum rate is derived by following equation: $\begin{matrix} {{{E\left\lbrack {R_{sum}(\psi)} \right\rbrack} = {{{\left( {1 - \psi} \right)^{2}{E\left\lbrack {{\log_{2}\left( {1 + \Gamma_{1}^{({0,0})}} \right)}\left( {1 + \Gamma_{2}^{({0,0})}} \right)} \right\rbrack}} + {{\psi \left( {1 - \psi} \right)}{E\left\lbrack {{\log_{2}\left( {1 + \Gamma_{1}^{({0,1})}} \right)}\left( {1 + \Gamma_{2}^{({1,0})}} \right)} \right\rbrack}} + {{\psi \left( {1 - \psi} \right)}{E\left\lbrack {{\log_{2}\left( {1 + \Gamma_{1}^{({1,0})}} \right)}\left( {1 + \Gamma_{2}^{({0,1})}} \right)} \right\rbrack}} + {\psi^{2}{E\left\lbrack {{\log_{2}\left( {1 + \Gamma_{1}^{({1,1})}} \right)}\left( {1 + \Gamma_{2}^{({1,1})}} \right)} \right\rbrack}}} \leq {{\left( {1 - \psi} \right)^{2}{\log_{2}\left( {{E\left\lbrack {1 + \Gamma_{1}^{({0,0})}} \right\rbrack}{E\left\lbrack {1 + \Gamma_{2}^{({0,0})}} \right)}} \right\rbrack}} + {{\psi \left( {1 - \psi} \right)}{\log_{2}\left( {{E\left\lbrack {1 + \Gamma_{1}^{({0,1})}} \right\rbrack}{E\left\lbrack {1 + \Gamma_{2}^{({1,0})}} \right)}} \right\rbrack}} + {{\psi \left( {1 - \psi} \right)}{\log_{2}\left( {{E\left\lbrack {1 + \Gamma_{1}^{({1,0})}} \right\rbrack}{E\left\lbrack {1 + \Gamma_{2}^{({0,1})}} \right)}} \right\rbrack}} + {\psi^{2}{\log_{2}\left( {{E\left\lbrack {1 + \Gamma_{1}^{({1,1})}} \right\rbrack}{E\left\lbrack {1 + \Gamma_{2}^{({1,1})}} \right)}} \right\rbrack}}} \equiv {R_{sum}^{U}(\psi)}}},} & \lbrack{Equation}\rbrack \end{matrix}$ where E(•) is a function for an expected value, R_(sum)(ψ) is the network-wide sum rate, R_(sum) ^(U)(ψ) is an upper bound of an expected value of the network-wide sum rate and Γ_(i) ^((m,l)) is SINR of the mobile station in an i-th cell where the i-th cell nullifies m generated interference links to neighboring cells and i-th cell received interference links of the mobile station in the i-th cell are nullified by the neighboring cells.
 3. The system of claim 1, wherein the value of ψ that maximizes the network-wide sum rate is derived by following equation: $\begin{matrix} {{{(1)\mspace{14mu} A} < 0}{\psi^{*} = \begin{pmatrix} 0 & {if} & {\psi^{D} < 0} \\ \psi^{D} & {if} & {0 \leq \psi^{D} \leq 1} \\ 1 & {if} & {1 < \psi} \end{pmatrix}}{{(2)\mspace{14mu} A} > 0}{\psi^{*} = \begin{pmatrix} 0 & {if} & {{\psi^{D}} \leq {{\psi^{D} - 1}}} \\ 1 & {if} & {{\psi^{D}} > {{\psi^{D} - 1}}} \end{pmatrix}}{{where},{\psi^{D} = {{{- B}/2}\; A}},{{s.t.\mspace{14mu} \left\lbrack \frac{\partial{R_{sum}^{U}(\psi)}}{\partial\psi} \right\rbrack_{\psi = \psi^{D}}} = 0},{{R_{sum}^{U}(\psi)} \approx {{A\; \psi^{2}} + {B\; \psi} + C}},}} & \lbrack{Equation}\rbrack \end{matrix}$ where R_(sum)(ψ) is the network-wide sum rate, R_(sum) ^(U)(ψ) is an upper bound of an expected value of the network-wide sum rate, ψ* is at least one optimal value of probability ψ, ψ^(D) is a point of at least one pole, A, B and C are coefficients determined by a power of the apparatus for providing the beamforming vector and a location of at least one receiver.
 4. An apparatus for providing a beamforming vector that is comprised in a transmitter, wherein the transmitter that comprises a plurality of cell and transmits a signal to a receiver that comprises at least one mobile station, the apparatus comprising: a control module that defines a probability (ψ) of interference cancelation, expresses a network-wide sum rate as a function of ψ, calculates a value of ψ that maximizes the network-wide sum rate and calculates magnitude of canceled interference channel corresponding the value of ψ.
 5. The apparatus of claim 4, wherein the network-wide sum rate is derived by following equation: $\begin{matrix} {{{E\left\lbrack {R_{sum}(\psi)} \right\rbrack} = {{{\left( {1 - \psi} \right)^{2}{E\left\lbrack {{\log_{2}\left( {1 + \Gamma_{1}^{({0,0})}} \right)}\left( {1 + \Gamma_{2}^{({0,0})}} \right)} \right\rbrack}} + {{\psi \left( {1 - \psi} \right)}{E\left\lbrack {{\log_{2}\left( {1 + \Gamma_{1}^{({0,1})}} \right)}\left( {1 + \Gamma_{2}^{({1,0})}} \right)} \right\rbrack}} + {{\psi \left( {1 - \psi} \right)}{E\left\lbrack {{\log_{2}\left( {1 + \Gamma_{1}^{({1,0})}} \right)}\left( {1 + \Gamma_{2}^{({0,1})}} \right)} \right\rbrack}} + {\psi^{2}{E\left\lbrack {{\log_{2}\left( {1 + \Gamma_{1}^{({1,1})}} \right)}\left( {1 + \Gamma_{2}^{({1,1})}} \right)} \right\rbrack}}} \leq {{\left( {1 - \psi} \right)^{2}{\log_{2}\left( {{E\left\lbrack {1 + \Gamma_{1}^{({0,0})}} \right\rbrack}{E\left\lbrack {1 + \Gamma_{2}^{({0,0})}} \right)}} \right\rbrack}} + {{\psi \left( {1 - \psi} \right)}{\log_{2}\left( {{E\left\lbrack {1 + \Gamma_{1}^{({0,1})}} \right\rbrack}{E\left\lbrack {1 + \Gamma_{2}^{({1,0})}} \right)}} \right\rbrack}} + {{\psi \left( {1 - \psi} \right)}{\log_{2}\left( {{E\left\lbrack {1 + \Gamma_{1}^{({1,0})}} \right\rbrack}{E\left\lbrack {1 + \Gamma_{2}^{({0,1})}} \right)}} \right\rbrack}} + {\psi^{2}{\log_{2}\left( {{E\left\lbrack {1 + \Gamma_{1}^{({1,1})}} \right\rbrack}{E\left\lbrack {1 + \Gamma_{2}^{({1,1})}} \right)}} \right\rbrack}}} \equiv {R_{sum}^{U}(\psi)}}},} & \lbrack{Equation}\rbrack \end{matrix}$ where E(•) is a function for an expected value, R_(sum)(ψ) is the network-wide sum rate, R_(sum) ^(U)(ψ) is an upper bound of an expected value of the network-wide sum rate and Γ_(i) ^((m,l)) is SINR of the mobile station in an i-th cell where the i-th cell nullifies m generated interference links to neighboring cells and i-th cell received interference links of the mobile station in the i-th cell are nullified by the neighboring cells.
 6. The apparatus of claim 4, wherein the value of ψ that maximizes the network-wide sum rate is derived by following equation: $\begin{matrix} {{{(1)\mspace{14mu} A} < 0}{\psi^{*} = \begin{pmatrix} 0 & {if} & {\psi^{D} < 0} \\ \psi^{D} & {if} & {0 \leq \psi^{D} \leq 1} \\ 1 & {if} & {1 < \psi} \end{pmatrix}}{{(2)\mspace{14mu} A} > 0}{\psi^{*} = \begin{pmatrix} 0 & {if} & {{\psi^{D}} \leq {{\psi^{D} - 1}}} \\ 1 & {if} & {{\psi^{D}} > {{\psi^{D} - 1}}} \end{pmatrix}}{{where},{\psi^{D} = {{{- B}/2}\; A}},{{s.t.\mspace{14mu} \left\lbrack \frac{\partial{R_{sum}^{U}(\psi)}}{\partial\psi} \right\rbrack_{\psi = \psi^{D}}} = 0},{{R_{sum}^{U}(\psi)} \approx {{A\; \psi^{2}} + {B\; \psi} + C}},}} & \lbrack{Equation}\rbrack \end{matrix}$ where R_(sum)(ψ) is the network-wide sum rate, R_(sum) ^(U)(ψ) is an upper bound of an expected value of the network-wide sum rate, ψ* is at least one optimal value of probability ψ, ψ^(D) is a point of at least one pole, A, B and C are coefficients determined by a power of the apparatus for providing the beamforming vector and a location of at least one receiver.
 7. A method for providing beamforming vector by an apparatus for providing beamforming vector that is comprised in a transmitter, wherein the transmitter that comprises a plurality of cell and transmits a signal to a receiver that comprises at least one mobile station, the method comprising: defining a probability (ψ) of interference cancelation; expressing a network-wide sum rate as a function of ψ; calculating a value of ψ that maximizes the network-wide sum rate; and calculating magnitude of canceled interference channel corresponding the value of ψ.
 8. The method of claim 7, wherein the network-wide sum rate is derived by following equation: $\begin{matrix} {{{E\left\lbrack {R_{sum}(\psi)} \right\rbrack} = {{{\left( {1 - \psi} \right)^{2}{E\left\lbrack {{\log_{2}\left( {1 + \Gamma_{1}^{({0,0})}} \right)}\left( {1 + \Gamma_{2}^{({0,0})}} \right)} \right\rbrack}} + {{\psi \left( {1 - \psi} \right)}{E\left\lbrack {{\log_{2}\left( {1 + \Gamma_{1}^{({0,1})}} \right)}\left( {1 + \Gamma_{2}^{({1,0})}} \right)} \right\rbrack}} + {{\psi \left( {1 - \psi} \right)}{E\left\lbrack {{\log_{2}\left( {1 + \Gamma_{1}^{({1,0})}} \right)}\left( {1 + \Gamma_{2}^{({0,1})}} \right)} \right\rbrack}} + {\psi^{2}{E\left\lbrack {{\log_{2}\left( {1 + \Gamma_{1}^{({1,1})}} \right)}\left( {1 + \Gamma_{2}^{({1,1})}} \right)} \right\rbrack}}} \leq {{\left( {1 - \psi} \right)^{2}{\log_{2}\left( {{E\left\lbrack {1 + \Gamma_{1}^{({0,0})}} \right\rbrack}{E\left\lbrack {1 + \Gamma_{2}^{({0,0})}} \right)}} \right\rbrack}} + {{\psi \left( {1 - \psi} \right)}{\log_{2}\left( {{E\left\lbrack {1 + \Gamma_{1}^{({0,1})}} \right\rbrack}{E\left\lbrack {1 + \Gamma_{2}^{({1,0})}} \right)}} \right\rbrack}} + {{\psi \left( {1 - \psi} \right)}{\log_{2}\left( {{E\left\lbrack {1 + \Gamma_{1}^{({1,0})}} \right\rbrack}{E\left\lbrack {1 + \Gamma_{2}^{({0,1})}} \right)}} \right\rbrack}} + {\psi^{2}{\log_{2}\left( {{E\left\lbrack {1 + \Gamma_{1}^{({1,1})}} \right\rbrack}{E\left\lbrack {1 + \Gamma_{2}^{({1,1})}} \right)}} \right\rbrack}}} \equiv {R_{sum}^{U}(\psi)}}},} & \lbrack{Equation}\rbrack \end{matrix}$ where E(•) is a function for an expected value, R_(sum)(ψ) is the network-wide sum rate, R_(sum) ^(U)(ψ) is an upper bound of an expected value of the network-wide sum rate and Γ_(i) ^((m,l)) is SINR of the mobile station in an i-th cell where the i-th cell nullifies m generated interference links to neighboring cells and i-th cell received interference links of the mobile station in the i-th cell are nullified by the neighboring cells.
 9. The method of claim 7, wherein the value of ψ that maximizes the network-wide sum rate is derived by following equation: $\begin{matrix} {{{(1)\mspace{14mu} A} < 0}{\psi^{*} = \begin{pmatrix} 0 & {if} & {\psi^{D} < 0} \\ \psi^{D} & {if} & {0 \leq \psi^{D} \leq 1} \\ 1 & {if} & {1 < \psi} \end{pmatrix}}{{(2)\mspace{14mu} A} > 0}{\psi^{*} = \begin{pmatrix} 0 & {if} & {{\psi^{D}} \leq {{\psi^{D} - 1}}} \\ 1 & {if} & {{\psi^{D}} > {{\psi^{D} - 1}}} \end{pmatrix}}{{where},{\psi^{D} = {{{- B}/2}\; A}},{{s.t.\mspace{14mu} \left\lbrack \frac{\partial{R_{sum}^{U}(\psi)}}{\partial\psi} \right\rbrack_{\psi = \psi^{D}}} = 0},{{R_{sum}^{U}(\psi)} \approx {{A\; \psi^{2}} + {B\; \psi} + C}},}} & \lbrack{Equation}\rbrack \end{matrix}$ where R_(sum)(ψ) is the network-wide sum rate, R_(sum) ^(U)(ψ) is an upper bound of an expected value of the network-wide sum rate, ψ* is at least one optimal value of probability ψ, ψ^(D) is a point of at least one pole, A, B and C are coefficients determined by a power of the apparatus for providing the beamforming vector and a location of at least one receiver.
 10. A non-transitory recording medium storing a readable program for causing a computer to execute a method for providing beamforming vector by an apparatus for providing beamforming vector that is comprised in a transmitter, wherein the transmitter that comprises a plurality of cell and transmits a signal to a receiver that comprises at least one mobile station, the method comprising: defining a probability (ψ) of interference cancelation; expressing a network-wide sum rate as a function of ψ; calculating a value of ψ that maximizes the network-wide sum rate; and calculating magnitude of canceled interference channel corresponding the value of ψ. 